zheng
b076815171
Some checks failed
Tests / test (push) Has been cancelled
按 U-Claw-海外化改造方案.md 与 范围决策记录.md 实施。这是 fork，不回上游： 海外版删掉的正是上游的中国市场默认值。 阶段 0 地基 - 下载源全部改国际：脚本/CI 61 处 + lockfile 880 条 npmmirror URL 归零 （lockfile 那 880 条是 npm 的 resolved 字段，脚本层参数化根本绕不过它） - 移除 install.ps1 里三个第三方 GitHub 加速代理，bundle 改直连 + SHA256 校验 （原来只检查"文件大于 1MB"就解压运行） - 技能内容与分发分离：skills/manifest.json 单一来源，install.sh 1170→658 行、 install.ps1 721→546 行，两者技能内容归零 实测原来是三份不一致：skills-cn 完整、install.sh 约 40%、install.ps1 约 17%， 且 7 个通用技能只有 U 盘版有 —— 一键安装的用户一个能用的技能都没有 - Node 版本三种（v22.14/16/22.1）统一，新建 NODE_VERSION 单一来源 - Config 页三份合一。portable/Config.html 用根相对路径调 API 却只从 file:// 打开， 保存功能已静默失效两个月；现缩为 120 行重定向壳 - 测试接入 CI（此前 node --test 无人运行，所有断言形同虚设） 阶段 1 双语可用 - 浏览器侧 i18n：JSON 为源、生成经典 script（file:// 下 fetch 本地 JSON 被拦） 语言跟盘走不跟机器走：启动器写 data/.openclaw/locale.js - 8 处硬编码 lang="zh-CN" 归零，data-i18n 覆盖 213 处，词条 en/zh 各 279 条 - B3 单框 Key：12 张模型卡 → 一个输入框，前缀识别 provider， 服务端 /api/test-key 发 1-token 请求实测，错误映射成人话 Key 填错到得知：从"直到对话失败"降到 ≤1 秒 - 区域格式 SG：DD/MM/YYYY、12 小时、S$、Asia/Singapore （ICU 在 en-SG 下把 SGD 渲染成裸 $，与美元无法区分，故自行拼 S$） - README 内容分叉而非翻译，§1.3 证据清单逐条清零 阶段 2 降门槛 - 启动逻辑上移 lib/start.mjs：Windows-Start.bat 220→28 行、 Mac-Start.command 235→33 行 修掉 Mac 侧两个 bug：控制台端口硬编码 18788（回落时打开死页）、 微信插件从未在 Mac 上安装 - U 盘根目录 23 → 3 个可点文件，其余进 advanced/ - 首启向导：语言 → 用途（7 角色，manifest 驱动）→ 密钥，答过不再问 - 三档界面，Simple 档隐藏一切技术名词 - 自动自愈：启动失败先自查自修，修不好导出脱敏诊断包 （Doctor 从"用户要知道去点的工具"变成后台机制） 阶段 3 技能库 - 19 个英文技能，planned 归零。sg-weather / sg-transport 的端点均实测过 - SkillHub 从 56 张手写第三方卡片改为 manifest 生成：703→125 行，中文归零 其他 - origin.json 收拢所有运行时地址，tests/origin.test.mjs 保证迁移不会漏 - portable/ 下用户可见中文归零（由断言保证） - 82 项测试 未验证（本机无 Windows / 无 pwsh）： - install.ps1、setup.ps1 约 210 行改动从未经 PowerShell 解析器 - 完整启动路径仅在假 node + 假 openclaw 上冒烟 - 8 个 .bat 的盘根推导仅静态断言 详见 U盘实测清单.md 受阻： - 隐藏黑窗口 —— 需代码签名证书（.vbs 已被 Windows 弃用，替代方案都要签名） - 场景卡 —— OpenClaw 上游 Dashboard 无预填 prompt 接口 - 官网 36 条 —— 上游 2026-04-14 拆到私有仓库，无权限
64 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: x-poster
|
|
description: "Posts and threads for X - fitting a point into the limit, and knowing when a thread is the wrong format"
|
|
metadata: { "openclaw": { "emoji": "🐦" } }
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Posts for X
|
|
|
|
Short posts and threads.
|
|
|
|
## Single post first
|
|
|
|
Most threads should have been one post. Before writing one, check whether the
|
|
point survives compression — if it does, a single post travels further and costs
|
|
the reader nothing.
|
|
|
|
A thread earns its place when there is a genuine sequence: steps, a chronology,
|
|
a set of examples that each need room.
|
|
|
|
## Writing one
|
|
|
|
- **Front-load.** The first line is what appears everywhere it gets quoted.
|
|
- **One idea.** Two ideas in one post means neither gets replied to.
|
|
- **Cut the wind-up.** "I've been thinking a lot about…" is deletable, always.
|
|
- **No thread emoji ladders**, no "a 🧵", no "bookmark this".
|
|
|
|
## Threads, when you do need one
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
1/ The claim, standing alone. Someone who reads only this should get the point.
|
|
2-n/ One step or example per post, each readable on its own
|
|
n/ What to do with it — a link, a question, or nothing
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Every post in a thread gets read out of context by someone. None of them should
|
|
depend on the previous one to make sense.
|
|
|
|
## Length
|
|
|
|
The limit is generous now, but reach still favours short. Aim for something that
|
|
fits without scrolling; use the extra room only when cutting would cost meaning.
|
|
|
|
## Example prompts
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Compress this into one post — I think the thread is unnecessary
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Thread version of this blog post, four or five posts, no hype
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Rewrite this so it doesn't sound like an engagement-bait account
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Working notes
|
|
|
|
- Links reduce reach; a post that stands alone and puts the link in a reply
|
|
usually does better. Say this rather than silently restructuring.
|
|
- Ask who the account is talking to. A developer account and a company account
|
|
writing the same announcement should not sound the same.
|
|
- Do not fabricate metrics, quotes or customer stories to make a post land.
|